Why are short-lived record-centric processes preferred over long-running processes?

Why are short-lived record-centric processes preferred over long-running processes?

• A. They take longer to build and require low maintenance
• B. They consume fewer system resources, are built faster, and require less effort to maintain
• C. They are easier to debug and monitor
• D. They offer enhanced reporting capabilities

Answer: (B)

Short-lived record-centric processes are preferred primarily because they consume fewer system resources, can be built faster, and require less effort to maintain. This efficiency stems from their design, which allows them to complete tasks swiftly and often within a confined scope that relates to a specific record or data entry. By keeping the processes short-lived, the system manages resources more effectively, avoiding prolonged locking of records or data that could hinder performance. These processes typically have simpler workflows than longer-running ones, making them quicker to develop. Maintenance is also simplified, as changes to the process can be implemented without impacting extensive systems or workflows. In contrast, long-running processes can be resource-intensive, as they need to manage ongoing tasks over an extended period, potentially leading to higher maintenance burdens and more complex debugging and reporting challenges. The preference for short-lived processes aligns with the goals of optimizing system performance and ensuring agility in application development and maintenance.

Short-lived record-centric processes are preferred primarily because they consume fewer system resources, can be built faster, and require less effort to maintain. This efficiency stems from their design, which allows them to complete tasks swiftly and often within a confined scope that relates to a specific record or data entry.

By keeping the processes short-lived, the system manages resources more effectively, avoiding prolonged locking of records or data that could hinder performance. These processes typically have simpler workflows than longer-running ones, making them quicker to develop. Maintenance is also simplified, as changes to the process can be implemented without impacting extensive systems or workflows.

In contrast, long-running processes can be resource-intensive, as they need to manage ongoing tasks over an extended period, potentially leading to higher maintenance burdens and more complex debugging and reporting challenges. The preference for short-lived processes aligns with the goals of optimizing system performance and ensuring agility in application development and maintenance.